top of page
Conitive liberty 
Institute of Neurotechnology & Law | INL Neurotech and Law

What is cognitive liberty?

Neurotechnology is a burgeoning field that holds immense potential for advancing medical treatments and understanding the human brain. However, this technological progress also raises important ethical considerations, especially concerning discrimination and bias. In this essay, we will delve into the significance of guarding against discrimination in the realm of neurotechnology, particularly focusing on algorithmic bias, the dangers of discriminating based on thoughts, and the importance of protecting individuals, especially the neurodivergent, from unfair treatment.


Algorithmic bias is a pressing issue in various fields, including neurotechnology. As algorithms are programmed by humans, they can inherit biases present in the data used to train them. This bias can result in discriminatory outcomes, particularly in applications like neuroimaging analysis or brain-computer interfaces. Discrimination based on thoughts or brain patterns is a violation of an individual's privacy and autonomy, as thoughts are intimate and personal. The misuse of neurotechnology to infer an individual's intentions or characteristics solely based on their neural activity can lead to severe consequences, such as denial of opportunities or stigmatization.


Another critical issue is the risk of discriminating against individuals based on EEG readings that reveal underlying medical conditions. While EEG technology can provide valuable insights into brain function, interpreting these results inaccurately or without proper consent can lead to harmful outcomes. For instance, an individual may not be aware of their medical condition, and disclosing this information without their consent could result in psychological distress or discriminatory actions.


Individuals who are neurodivergent, such as those with autism or ADHD, are particularly vulnerable to discrimination in the context of neurotechnology. Their unique neurological traits may be misunderstood or misconstrued, leading to biased assumptions and unfair treatment. Safeguards must be put in place to ensure that neurodivergent individuals are not unfairly judged or disadvantaged due to their brain differences.


The possibility of bias and untrue assumptions in neurotechnological applications underscores the importance of promoting awareness and education in this field. Organizations and policymakers should prioritize the development of ethical guidelines and regulations to address these concerns proactively. Moreover, training programs for professionals working with neurotechnology should emphasize principles of non-discrimination and respect for individuals' neurodiversity.


In the workplace, there is a particular risk of unfair treatment based on neurotechnological data. Employers must be cautious in utilizing neurotechnology for hiring, promotion, or disciplinary purposes to avoid discrimination. Transparent policies and guidelines should be established to protect employees' privacy and prevent misuse of neurodata in employment decisions.


In conclusion, as neurotechnology continues to evolve, ensuring the ethical and responsible use of these powerful tools is paramount. Guarding against discrimination, algorithmic bias, and unfair treatment is essential to uphold individual rights, privacy, and dignity. By promoting awareness, fostering dialogue, and implementing robust safeguards, we can harness the potential of neurotechnology while mitigating the risks of discrimination in this rapidly advancing field.

bottom of page